Security was increased along the borders of the national capital ahead of a tractor rally of farmers on Thursday morning. The farmers will hold the rally at 11am at four borders of Delhi in protest against the Centre's agriculture laws.

Tractor march live updates: Farmers hold rally in Haryana's Palwal - The Times of India: Security was increased along the borders of the national capital ahead of a tractor rally of farmers on Thursday morning. The farmers will hold the rally at 11am at four borders of Delhi in protest against the Centre's agriculture laws.

Vaidushya Parth 05 Jan 2021 parliament. In India, both Houses of Parliament are meant to act as checks and balances so that no branch of the government becomes too puissant in command and authority. The Rajya Sabha was meant to be more balanced and deliberative than the Lok Sabha and be free from the siege of electoral politics. But this hasn’t happened in recent years as the government has tried to bamboozle its way through and prevent the Upper House’s scrutiny of Bills passed by the Lok Sabha, writes VAIDUSHYA PARTH A formidable sinister interest may always obtain the complete command of a dominant assembly by some chance and for a moment, and it is therefore of great use to have a second chamber of an opposite sort, differently composed, in which that interest in all likelihood will not rule.”– Walter Bagehot, British essayist In the Indian constitutional scheme of things, the work of Parliament is to make laws (legislation), check the work of the government (scrutinising the role of the executive), and to conduct debates on current issues of public importance. Generally, the decisions made in one House have to be approved by the other. In this manner, the two-chamber system performs as a check and balance. This set-up was introduced to ensure that no branch of government becomes too puissant in command and authority. CONSTITUTIONAL SCHEME OF BICAMERALISM This bicameral legislature is the first line of checks against any arbitrary executive action. The basis of an Upper House and its position and function in parliamentary democracy has always remained a subject of passionate and fiery debate. In the accounts of Constitution-making, there were occasions when statesmen, writers and thinkers expressed antithetical views on the efficacy of an Upper House. Some held that a Second Chamber was destructive of “the will of the people”, illustrated and manifested through the publicly elected Lower House, while others underlined the need for such a House as “a safeguard against the tyranny of a single-chamber Legislature”. In the Constituent Assembly, during a discussion on the need for a Second Chamber, divergent views were expressed. The following reasons were cited in favour of it: (a) the requirement for a second look at Bills which may be the product of electoral equations or the tyranny of the popular majority; (b) the Second Chamber is more deliberative and nuanced; (c) the Second Chamber acts as a check on hasty and ill-conceived legislation; (d) it strengthens the federal structure. The Lok Sabha, in effect, if not in form, begins to serve as an executive, rather than a legislative (which it is ideally supposed to be) organ. The Lower House, inter alia, is, therefore, swayed by public passions, engrossed in ugly equations of electoral politics and eventually results into the epitome of majoritarianism. On the other hand, the great French constitutional expert, Abbe Sieyes, who rejected the concept of a Second Chamber, said: “If a Second Chamber dissents from the first, it is mischievous; if it agrees, it is superfluous.” Responding to this criticism, Dr B.R. Ambedkar, the architect of the Indian Constitution, said in the Constituent Assembly: “The [second part] of the criticism of Abbe Sieyes is undoubtedly valid because it is so obvious. But nobody has so far [endorsed the first part of the criticism] of Abbe Sieyes.” THE LOGIC OF CHECKS & BALANCES The Lok Sabha (the Lower House) is a publicly elected chamber. The political party with the largest number of seats there forms the government. It alone is responsible for making decisions on Money Bills. The Rajya Sabha can consider these Bills, but cannot block or amend them. The Lok Sabha, in effect, if not in form, begins to serve as an executive, rather than a legislative (which it is ideally supposed to be) organ. The Lower House, inter alia, is therefore swayed by public passions, engrossed in ugly equations of electoral politics and eventually results into the epitome of majoritarianism. Therefore, without effective bicameral legislative checks, the government of a parliamentary constitutional republic, at best, becomes an elected autocracy, and the sacrosanct “rule of law” takes the face of the notorious “rule by decree”. The Rajya Sabha is supposed to check and scrutinise the Lok Sabha, which in disguise is nothing but a chamber of the prime minister along with his council of ministers. To counter this, the Rajya Sabha, the second House, is independent of the elected Lok Sabha, and more balanced and deliberative in nature. Free from the siege of electoral politics, it is supposed to check and scrutinise the Lok Sabha, which in disguise is nothing but a chamber of the prime minister along with his council of ministers. This is especially so when it is occupied with a thumping majority, and in the wake of anti-defection laws, it disallows intra-party dissent. The Rajya Sabha, therefore, is made to play an important role in checking and balancing the actions of the popularly elected government. Its creation is a counter to what James Madison saw as the “fickleness and passion” that could absorb the publicly elected House. He noted further: “The use of the [Upper House] is to consist in its proceeding with more coolness, with more system and with more wisdom, than the popular branch.” The framers of the Indian Constitution consequently attempted to erect the government – following the Westminster model — on the edifice of various limits, controls and checks between the executive and the legislature. More importantly, this separation of power was not intended to be a mere matter of form but of substance. MONEY BILL – A TOOL OF SABOTAGE In recent years, the government, however, bamboozled this separation of powers by bypassing the Rajya Sabha through the instrumentality of the Money Bill (s). Notably, certifying a Bill as a Money Bill, which otherwise is a normal Bill, has serious consequences, as it rules out the security of the Rajya Sabha. Of late, there have been continued and deliberate attempts to prevent the Upper House’s scrutiny of Bills passed by the Lok Sabha, including the Electoral Bonds Scheme. In recent years, the government (executive), however, bamboozled this separation of powers by bypassing the Rajya Sabha through the instrumentality of the Money Bill (s). Notably, certifying a Bill as a Money Bill has very serious consequences, as it rules out the security of the Rajya Sabha. The manner adopted in passing these Bonds is symbolic of its arbitrary provisions. The Act was introduced as a Money Bill in the Lok Sabha and passed by it after rejecting five amendments proposed by the Rajya Sabha despite completely lacking the character of a Money Bill. At the outset, the law related to Money Bills needs to be clear. Article 109 of the Constitution lays down a special procedure with respect to Money Bills and Article 110 lays down strict criteria as to the categorisation of a Bill as a Money Bill. Clause (I) of Article 110 defines what will constitute a Money Bill. However, as per clause (2), the mere inclusion of some provisions relating to the matters listed in Clause (I) cannot transform the character of a Bill from an ordinary one to a Money Bill. Even more recently, the pull of the Upper House was bypassed in a distinct fashion by passing the controversial three farm Bills through a voice vote despite all repeated demand for division of votes. This can only be termed as a “fraud on the constitutional values”. In the present case though, even those “provisions” were absent. The question, therefore, of whether a statute violates the provision of the Constitution is one of illegality and open to judicial review. It is another matter that the next election cycle is around the corner — so many of them have passed ad interim – yet, the constitutional challenge to electoral bonds is waiting to be heard before the Supreme Court after nearly three years. Even more recently, the Upper House was bypassed in a distinct fashion by passing the controversial three farm Bills through a voice vote despite repeated demand for division of votes. This can only be termed as a “fraud on the constitutional values”.

When “Rule of Law” Becomes “Rule by Decree” in Parliament | NewsClick

HOPE FLOATS, RESISTANCE THRIVES. THEY ARE GOOD ARMOUR TO MEET 2021 WITH. Then, there is poetry. There is verse and songs from the protests. Or Maya Angelou’s “Still I Rise”, William Ernest Henley’s historic “Invictus” or then come home to Sahir Ludhianvi, whose birth centenary it is in 2021. An icon among Indian poet-lyricists, he wrote 50 years ago in the poem “Khoon Phir Khoon Hai”:

A Year of Losses but Hope Floats, Resistance Rises | NewsClick

Zulm ki baat hi kya, zulm ki aukat hi kya,

Zulm bas zulm hai, aaghaaz se anjaam tak,

Khoon phir khoon hai, so shakl badal sakta hai,

Aisi shaklen ke mitaao to mitaaye na bane,

Aise shole ke bujhaao to bhujaaye na bane,

Aise naare ke dabaoo to dabaaye na bane”

(What is oppression, what is its standing,

Oppression is but oppression, from beginning to end,

Blood is still blood, it can take myriad forms,

Such forms that cannot be erased,

Such embers that cannot be extinguished,

Such slogans that cannot be repressed.)

The author is a senior Mumbai-based journalist and columnist who writes on politics, cities, media and gender. The views are personal.

EVENT HIGHLIGHTS 09:01 AMFarmers continue to hold sit-in protest at Ghazipur (Delhi-UP border) 07:48 AMKarnataka govt to assist farmers double their income, says CM Yediyurappa 06:33 AMPunjab CM could have prevented the farm laws from being passed: AAP 12:32 AMPunjab farmers send legal notices to 3 BJP leaders for defaming their agitation 10:13 PMCongress leaders in Rajasthan to protest against farm laws tomorrow 08:42 PMFarmer impasse likely to be resolved on Monday 07:54 PM75-year-old farmer protesting against agri laws kills self at Uttar Pradesh-Delhi border 06:35 PMWill hold tractor parade towards Delhi on Jan 26 if demands not met: Farmer unions 05:27 PMFarmers to march into Delhi on Jan 26 if demands not met: Samyukt Kisan Morcha 04:09 PMGovt's commitment to welfare of farmers unparalleled: Javadekar Farmer protestA farmer shout slogans during a protest against farm bills at Singhu Border in New Delhi on Thursday. Farmers' protest LIVE updates Day 37: Hardening their position ahead of the next round of talks with the government, protesting farmer unions on Saturday said they will take out a tractor parade towards Delhi on January 26, when the country will celebrate Republic Day, if their demands are not met. The union leaders said the time has come for "decisive" action as their demands have not been addressed by the government yet. A 75-year-old farmer protesting against the Centre's new agri laws allegedly hanged himself at the Uttar Pradesh-Delhi border in Ghazipur. The farmers have been demanding the withdrawal of the three laws and legal guarantee for minimum support price (MSP) which is declared every year by the Centre for 23 crops while the government has assured them that it will accept their two more demands related to stubble burning and electricity subsidies. Farmers' protest is going on at Singhu border, Tikri border and Ghazipur border amid severe cold condition in Delhi and NCR. Stay tuned for latest updates on farmers' protest CATCH ALL THE LIVE UPDATES Auto Refresh 09:01 AM Farmers continue to hold sit-in protest at Ghazipur (Delhi-UP border) 07:48 AM Karnataka govt to assist farmers double their income, says CM Yediyurappa Karnataka Chief Minister BS Yediyurappa on Saturday said that the state government is working towards "enabling farmers to double their income" as envisaged by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In his inaugural address at the Horticulture Mela organised by the University of Horticulture, Bagalkote, Yediyurappa said that government intends to introduce new technologies in value addition, processing, storage and packaging of horticulture produce in collaboration with Central Food Technological Research Institute (CFTRI) and Indian Institute of Horticulture. He also assured that the government would take all necessary steps to consider Horticulture as an industry. 06:33 AM Punjab CM could have prevented the farm laws from being passed: AAP The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on Saturday said Punjab Chief Minister Captain Amarinder Singh could have prevented the farm laws from being passed in Parliament if he wanted but did not do so. AAP national convenor and Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal alleged that the Punjab Chief Minister is trying to protect his son from the Enforcement Directorate lens and Union Home Minister Amit Shah is also helping the Punjab CM in his tactics." 12:32 AM Punjab farmers send legal notices to 3 BJP leaders for defaming their agitation Punjab-based farmers have sent legal notices to Union Minister Giriraj Singh, Gujarat Deputy CM Nitin Patel and BJP leader Ram Madhav for their alleged defamatory/ derogatory statement regarding ongoing agitation at various Delhi borders against the agriculture laws. Farmers have sent the notices seeking an unconditional apology and unambiguous withdrawal of the alleged defamatory and derogatory statements made by the three leaders, ANI reported. Statements by several political leaders have not issued in good faith or with responsibility, but mala fide intent and for oblique motives to further vested interests and defame the protesting farmers, read the notice. A farmer from Amritsar, Jaskaran Singh Bandesha through notice to Giriraj Singh stated that farmers relentlessly giving their blood and sweat for the entire nation, and are widely considered to be the backbone of the entire country's economy and the agricultural system. 10:13 PM Congress leaders in Rajasthan to protest against farm laws tomorrow Several leaders from Rajasthan Congress including Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot, party's state unit chief Govind Singh Dotasara, former deputy chief minister Sachin Pilot will stage a protest at Jaipur's Shaheed Smarak demanding the repeal of new agriculture laws. Meanwhile, a number of farmers are protesting at different sites in the state against the contentious Acts. Rashtriya Loktantrik Party (RLP) has also withdrawn support from the NDA against these acts. Farmers have been protesting at different borders of the national capital for over a month against the Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020, the Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, 2020, and the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 2020. 08:42 PM Farmer impasse likely to be resolved on Monday After the last meeting of the government and farmers led to positivity and breaking of bread together, it appears that the over month-long deadlock may be resolved on Monday. Sources on both sides have indicated a thaw with a meeting ground on some of the most contentious issues emerging. The government may well be ready to offer amendments to the MSP and APMC issues in writing, IANS reported. As per the government and farmer sources, Monday will see a big breakthrough after more than six rounds of talks between the two parties have been held. The sticking points of MSP being retained and APMC may well see a resolution. In addition, at the 'mandis', the private players who are procuring will not be able to procure below the MSP. The dispute redressal system between the private players and the farmers will not be done by the SDM anymore. These have been some of the major demands of the farmers. Farmers do not want to be dragged out of their workplaces to run around needlessly to sort out issues. 07:54 PM 75-year-old farmer protesting against agri laws kills self at Uttar Pradesh-Delhi border A 75-year-old farmer protesting against the Centre's new agri laws allegedly hanged himself at the Uttar Pradesh-Delhi border in Ghazipur on Saturday morning. Sardar Kashmir Singh, a native of Bilaspur in Uttar Pradesh's Rampur district, hanged himself in a mobile toilet using a rope, police said. Deputy Superintendent of Police of Indirapuram Anshu Jain told PTI that a suicide note written in Gurumukhi was found on him. Singh wrote in the suicide note that the government must repeal these farm laws as these are against the interests of farmers, according to a leader of the Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU). The BKU and several other farmer unions have been spearheading the protest against the legislations at various border points of Delhi for over a month now. In the purported suicide note, Singh expressed anguish that though some people from Punjab died during the agitation, no one from Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand has sacrificed his life for the cause. 06:35 PM Will hold tractor parade towards Delhi on Jan 26 if demands not met: Farmer unions Hardening their position ahead of the next round of talks with the government, protesting farmer unions on Saturday said they will take out a tractor parade towards Delhi on January 26, when the country will celebrate Republic Day, if their demands are not met. Addressing a press conference, the union leaders said time has come for "decisive" action as their demands have not been addressed by the government yet. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson will be the chief guest at the Republic Day parade at Rajpath on January 26. Farmer leader Darshan Pal Singh said their proposed parade will be called "Kisan Parade" and it will be be held after the Republic Day parade. The next round of talks between the government and the protesting farmer unions is scheduled to be held on January 4. On Friday, the unions had announced that they would have to take firm steps if the meeting fails to resolve the deadlock. After the press conference, farmer leader Abhimanyu Kohar told PTI that farm unions are hopeful for the January 4 meeting, but they cannot trust the government going by their experience with them. 05:27 PM Farmers to march into Delhi on Jan 26 if demands not met: Samyukt Kisan Morcha

Friday, January 1, 2021

CLASS IMPLICATIONS **************************************************In addition to the global crisis, the Indian economy was in a tailspin as a consequence of both the demonetisation and GST implementation leading to a consistent decline in the GDP growth rate over the last few years. The Indian ruling classes were in search for further avenues to maintain and maximise their levels of profit in the background of the recession of the Indian economy, the impact of the Covid pandemic and the unplanned abrupt lockdown. The bourgeois-landlord ruling classes in India, led by the big bourgeoisie, using the trajectory of neo-liberal economic reforms has been further consolidating its efforts for maximisation of profits. The loot of national assets, the large-scale privatisation of the public sector, the handing over of all public wealth like mines etc., and public services to the private sector accompanied by abrogation of labour rights are a part of this process. This ongoing historic struggle of the peasantry has sharply brought out the efforts by the leadership of the Indian ruling classes to acquire corporate control over agriculture for its profit maximisation. A new class conflict is, thus, arising between the big bourgeoisie, in collaboration with international finance capital and the entire peasantry, including the rich peasants and landlords. Secondly, conflicts amongst the ruling class partners are also emerging between the big bourgeoisie, on the one hand, and the non-big bourgeoisie, particularly those belonging to the MSME sector, on the other. Thirdly, BJP’s drive to establish its complete political hegemony in the country by destroying the federal structure of our Constitution and, in its place, erect a unitary State structure is creating conflicts between the central government and elected state governments. Some regional parties, who head state governments, who were supporters of the BJP in the Parliament and those who vacillated and remained largely neutral in their support to the BJP in the Parliament, are being forced by this hegemonic drive of the BJP to come out in opposition, particularly during this ongoing kisan struggle. The emergence of such conflicts amongst the ruling class partners creates possibilities that must be utilised by the exploiting classes, particularly the working class, poor peasantry and agricultural labour, to intensify the class battles against the bourgeois-landlord class order. Such possibilities for advancing the class struggle have emerged with the growing coordination between the working-class trade union movement, peasantry and the agricultural labour. Such developments began much earlier and since 2018 made significant advances through joint movements of these sections. The November 26 all-India general strike call by the central trade unions converged with the calls by the kisan organisations on November 26-27 and the call for `Delhi Chalo’. This growing unity in struggles will, surely, be strengthened further in the coming period. Simultaneously, this period of intense class offensive mounted by the ruling classes along with the sharpening of communal polarisation and the undermining of the Indian Constitution is laying the ground for growing popular struggles against the policies of the present BJP central government. Such joint united struggles as well as the struggles on independent demands of different sections of the people like women, students, youth, dalits, tribals are bound to intensify in the coming period. These must be further strengthened. The BJP’s efforts to intensify the class offensive against the Indian people must be met and challenged by counter-class offensive by the exploited classes and sections of our people.

Repeal These Agri-Laws | Peoples Democracy

DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN In order to discredit this massive united protest in this severe cold wave in the most peaceful and disciplined manner, the BJP and the central government led by PM Modi have embarked upon a vicious disinformation campaign. First, they were levelling the protestors as being Khalistanis, Pakistanis, Chinese agents, urban naxals, tukde tukde gang etc. Then came the calumny that it is the opposition parties who are misleading the farmers. The fact remains that this protest is being organised and conducted by the Samyukta Kisan Morcha, a combine of more than 500 kisan organisations from all over the country with no involvement of any political party. PM Modi is personally leading such a campaign alleging, amongst others, that the opposition parties have all spoken for agrarian reforms in their election manifesto’s but are now opposing for the sake of opposition. Yes, as far as CPI(M) is concerned, we have always sought agrarian reforms as many other parties also did. But what type of reforms? The CPI(M) seeks reforms in order to strengthen India’s food security, produce enough grains to feed our people ensuring their proper nutrition and health, to provide an affordable remuneration to our farmers ensuring a reasonable price for the consumers by strengthening the public distribution system(PDS) and a further development of our agricultural sector. PM Modi’s reforms, however, as contained in the present laws, are to handover Indian agriculture, its markets and its produce to multinational agro-business giants, foreign and domestic corporates, severely jeopardising India’s food security; permitting large-scale hoarding of essential commodities, thus, creating artificial food shortages leading to massive price rise; dismantling of PDS and the provisioning of foodgrains at affordable prices. These laws destroy Indian agriculture while imposing greater miseries on our people. This is why many secular opposition parties have opposed these bills, supported and extend solidarity with the kisan protests and call upon the government to accept these demands and bring in reforms that provide prosperity and welfare for Indian people, not super-profits to foreign and domestic corporates.

Repeal These Agri-Laws | Peoples Democracy